This chapter is published as one of the last safe. To explain and bridge the press articles. The questions raised by Bruno Schillinger 3 criminal charges changed in the service apparatus somehow never asked 3 disciplinary proceedings. Since the demand for pain and suffering the communication by the authorities has been set - no phone call, nothing. There was of course no help or offer an explanation - not to speak of apology. Is still unclear why the high bailiff (neighbor BS) suddenly was advancing with police even though he had about 7 weeks earlier explains it all done for.
Questions about the death of his father undesirable - why three weeks detention
Court imposed a utopian days rate a Hartz IV recipients can not pay
Friday 24 October, 2008 by Martin Behrsing
Hartz IV recipients and unemployed member of the Forum Germany, Bruno S. * (Freiburg) repeatedly asked uncomfortable questions to the mayor of a suburb of Freiburg and members of the JV-high Black Forest, XY. *. (CDU). By injunction fought back and took care of it last Saturday throughout for the arrest of the critically ill p. However, on a technicality, it was not the arrest. Police and bailiffs were about to seriously ill people who desperately need medication and had no money, yourself With great difficulty to p dragged over 12km home
* Names changed by the editor (instructions at the end of the text)
»Fribourg / March -" Why you did not even inform the family when they brought my father to the hospital and then three weeks later he died, "For this question, Bruno S. was arrested on Saturday?. The Amtsgericht Freiburg had forbidden him this question to a mayor (CDU) in the vicinity of Freiburg and officials of the Employment Agency to provide. This should probably be made an example. Bruno S. Hartz IV recipients should be satisfied that the officers of a Hartz IV authority refuses to testify about his activities to the death of his father (GS) and explicitly invokes his right to silence.
The drama began with the death in September 2002 and is the highlight of last Saturday. Bruno S. was arrested in 2008 and spent the morning 18.Oktobers in the Freiburg prison. The goal is to bring p to silence was achieved through a legal "trick." The ALG II benefits was a utopian fine of 100, - € / day - iW hundred, 2,000 € and 5,000 € security deposit or 20 days in prison. In prison, however, it turned out that the bailiff had not applied for a regular command and S. Hart had to be immediately set free again. Neither police nor bailiff made for the repatriation of seriously ill Bruno S. and left it for themselves, although it was known that he had not taken any medication for his diabetes. The police claimed that they could not take him. P laboriously pointed out that he was sick and had no way to come home alone. However, the police put even a simple diagnosis: "To me, you make a normal impression," and let the diabetics are easy. The evening seemed more important. Here, the police were aware of the health problems. Bruno S. had on the trip several suffocation and a policeman sat opposite him. Also the policeman was present a continuing sick leave since August. In a very bad condition he was then met by friends at home, who first provided him and cared for assistance. .
It was quite clear to the Geicht that Bruno S. could not apply the penalty of a daily rate of 100 euros. "But the determination of the amount we deem unlawful because no social benefit recipients can ever afford such a high daily rate. Thus one is going Inconvenient questioner. It gives the impression that officials among colleagues rely on, "said Martin Behrsing, spokesman for the unemployed Forum Germany.
Bruno S. is very well advanced on the path to truth. Thus he was able to prove that both the lawyer and son of the CDU politician, and XY., Financial manager of the father of Bruno S., the survivors had lied for years. Just as he had initially lied to the district court, however, he was transferred with his own records (Nov. 2004).
So also the official was transferred. The father of Bruno S. was not so suddenly died, as the politicians had used it. The father fought at least six long days against the cancer death. The politician and employment agency staff XY. but allegedly no time to inform the family. He pretended to have gwußt none of that.
New documents prove, however, that he was active as a supervisor, was informed before the patient about the fatal prognosis, even agreeing to the nursing home and went about his duties only for their own benefit. The work as a supervisor he had at first concealed in court.
In addition, however, he did have the time, from the account of dying over € 33.000, - withdraw in cash, supposedly to give him a few days before death, in hospital. As it turned out the dying man was already not clearly addressed. The deceased was already there in agony and the CDU politician Notary attested in the subsequent lineup, so under penalty of perjury »€ 0.00 cash."
Not a cent for telephone calls, drinks, etc? Not even the pro forma was reviewed by H.. All this is very dubious.
But it got worse. XY. was simply cremate the deceased against the wishes of the family. He used a photocopied proxies from the past. In fact, he only had a valid power of attorney, which did not go beyond death. "But what does not fit, make it fit. He pieced together old powers and deceived the cemetery administration. For me, the desecration, "said Bruno S. against the unemployed Forum Germany. But the investigating public prosecutor had placed a complaint with the S. seemed not to care that. It was enough that the son (lawyer) of the CDU politician presented any powers to stop all proceedings against H.. The submission of powers of attorney was recorded in the minutes to convey a serious appearance - but no copies were made.
Bruno S. was the truth about the circumstances of his father's Tods closer every day, but it seemed as if he was opposed by all means, the more he amassed. The unemployed had e.g. p even tried to bodies which have made a move imperative, but its consortium responsible displaced any costs commitments until the place was invalid. In other cases, applications were abducted by him and not edited or rejected completely illegal. Also for the month of October was Bruno S. its services only at 24.10. paid, although this earlier this month on his account should have been credited.
"We expect that here at last light coming into the darkness. Bruno S. legitimate questions and the more you deal with the issue, the more inconsistencies appear. But as a muzzled simply adopted. Particularly scandalous is that our Chancellor, to which Bruno S. had turned for help to him only a "God bless you answered" is. As party leader they could ensure a fair education. But now, Bruno S. is sentenced to a daily rate that is so unrealistic that only mandatory detention remains. Since the Court had indeed directly to arrange custody, "said Martin Behrsing, spokesman for the unemployed Forum Germany.
The unemployed Forum Germany are large documents before as evidence. Similarly, the initiative has the names of those involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment